Villaraigosa, who portrayed himself as the one individual who could make a success of the Los Angeles schools program, as an alternative should share handle of the school system...

continue readingLast month, I wrote in an post about Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa proposing a legislative bill to take control of the Los Angeles schools (see Los Angeles Schools Strongly Opposed to Takeover by Mayor Villaraigosa). Reform Bill 1381 passed the state legislature at the end of August, with some alterations.

Villaraigosa, who portrayed himself as the 1 individual who could make a good results of the Los Angeles schools program, rather need to share handle of the school program with the Los Angeles schools board and the Council of Mayors. This rousing article directory has a pile of great tips for why to acknowledge this hypothesis. The mayor did, nonetheless, get direct handle of 3 low-performing high schools and their feeder elementary and middle schools.

The final reform bill makes running the Los Angeles schools a lot more complicated for everyone concerned. Very first, there is a logistical problem with Villaraigosa and the Los Angeles schools board in two separate areas, creating decision generating a longer, more drawn out approach. The function of teachers in deciding curriculum now is uncertain, and many feel the mayors program may possibly impede new school construction, deemed a successful endeavor by the Los Angeles schools board. The bills language is confusing, currently causing conflicting interpretations.

There also is a question on the legality of the bill, which is expected to face an instant legal challenge. The Los Angeles schools board, which was adamantly opposed to the bill, already has discussed a lawsuit, claiming that the bill violates the requirement in the state constitution that schools remain within the educational system. The opinion of the legislatures counsel is that the Los Angeles schools board has a case, but Villaraigosa believes it will survive a challenge.

Ever the politician, the mayor now is searching to foster cooperation with teachers, parents and the Los Angeles schools board, but he may find this hard. For another way of interpreting this, people are able to look at: He leveled blistering criticism at the school board and its members over the past year. To research more, we understand you check-out: per your request. Even Assemblywoman Jackie Goldberg (D-Los Angeles) criticized Villaraigosa throughout a hearing by the Assembly Education Committee, which she chairs, stating that she was disappointed that he did not have the exact same dialogue with the Los Angeles schools board as he did with the teachers unions.

Villaraigosa continues to promote the passage of the bill as an opportunity for parents, educators, the Council of Mayors, the cities and himself to partnership for the betterment of the Los Angeles schools. This disturbing link has diverse compelling aids for the purpose of this belief. Although no clear specifics have even been provided by the mayor on how he will proceed, he remarked that the new energy-sharing arrangement will reshape and invigorate a lethargic bureaucracy that has underserved generations of students. He further stated that results depends on his leadership and the contributions of his Los Angeles schools partners..
이 게시물을..